[Optimization of phacoemulsification technique for Morgagnian cataract]. / Optimizatsiya tekhnologii fakoemul'sifikatsii morganievoi katarakty.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to develop a new optimized phacoemulsification technique for Morgagnian cataract taking into account the anatomical and topographic parameters of the lens nucleus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A working classification of Morgagnian cataract was developed based on the size of the nucleus: if the edge of the nucleus is visualized at the upper edge of the pupil or between the upper edge and the middle of the pupil, it was classified as an initial stage of Morgagnian cataract with a large nucleus; if the upper edge of the nucleus is visualized in the middle of the pupil and below, it was classified as an advanced stage of Morgagnian cataract with a small nucleus. The first group included six patients who underwent surgery using the scaffold technique with removal of the whole small nucleus into the anterior chamber. The second group included 11 patients who underwent surgery using the scaffold technique with removal of the last fragment of the nucleus into the anterior chamber. RESULTS: The use of the scaffold technique with removal of the nucleus into the anterior chamber helped reduce the number of intraoperative complications to 16.7% in the first group, compared to 27.3% in the second group, and the percentage of endothelial cell loss to 10.1% in the first group, compared to 10.7% in the second group. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical and topographic features of the lens and the anterior segment of the eye in Morgagnian cataract with a small nucleus allow for preliminary implantation of an intraocular lens into the capsular bag to protect the posterior capsule during phacoemulsification of the nucleus with minimal mechanical, hydrodynamic and acoustic damage to the surrounding structures of the eye.

Evaluation of the early use of norepinephrine in major abdominal surgery on medical and surgical postoperative complications: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (EPON STUDY).

BACKGROUND: Post-induction anaesthesia often promotes intraoperative hypotension (IOH) that can worsen postoperative outcomes. This study aims to assess the benefit of norepinephrine versus ephedrine at the induction of anaesthesia to prevent postoperative complications following major abdominal surgery by preventing IOH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The EPON STUDY is a prospective single-centre randomised controlled trial with the planned inclusion of 500 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery at the Amiens University Hospital. The inclusion criteria are patients aged over 50 years weighing more than 50 kg with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of ≥2 undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients are allocated either to the intervention group (n=250) or the standard group (n=250). In the intervention group, the prevention of post-induction IOH is performed with norepinephrine (dilution to 0.016 mg/mL) using an electric syringe pump at a rate of 0.48 mg/h (30 mL/h) from the start of anaesthesia and then titrated to achieve the haemodynamic target. In the control group, the prevention of post-induction IOH is performed with manual titration of ephedrine, with a maximal dose of 30 mg, followed by perfusion with norepinephrine. In both groups, the haemodynamic target to maintain is a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm Hg or 70 mm Hg for patients with a medical history of hypertension. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. The primary outcome is the Clavien-Dindo score assessed up to 30 days postoperatively. The secondary endpoints are the length of hospital stay and length of stay in an intensive care unit/postoperative care unit; postoperative renal function; postoperative cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, haematological and infectious complications at 1 month; and volume of intraoperative vascular filling and mortality at 1 month. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the committee of protection of the persons of Ile de France in May 2021 (number 21 05 41). The authors will be involved in disseminating the research findings (through attending conferences and co-authoring papers). The results of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05276596.

Machine learning model based on RCA-PDCA nursing methods and differentiating factors to predict hypotension during cesarean section surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension during cesarean section has become a serious complication for maternal and fetal healthy. It is commonly encountered by subarachnoid anesthesia. However, currently used control methods have varying degrees of side effects, such as drugs. The Root Cause Analysis (RCA) - Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) is a new model of care that identifies the root causes of problems. The study aimed to demonstrate the usefulness of RCA-PDCA nursing methods in preventing intraoperative hypotension during cesarean section and to predict the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension through a machine learning model. METHODS: Patients who underwent cesarean section at Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University from January 2023 to December 2023 were retrospectively screened, and the data of their gestational times, age, height, weight, history of allergies, intraoperative vital signs, fetal condition, operative time, fluid out and in, adverse effects, use of vasopressor drugs, anxiety-depression-pain scores, and satisfaction were collected and analyzed. The statistically different features were screened and five machine learning models were used as predictive models to assess the usefulness of the RCA-PDCA model of care. RESULTS: (1) Compared with the general nursing model, the RCA-PDCA nursing model significantly reduces the incidence of intraoperative hypotension and postoperative complications in cesarean delivery, and the patient experience is comfortable and satisfactory. (2) Among the five machine learning models, the RF model has the best predictive performance, and the accuracy of the random forest model in preventing intraoperative hypotension is as high as 90%. CONCLUSION: Through computer machine learning model analysis, we prove the importance of the RCA-PDCA nursing method in the prevention of intraoperative hypotension during cesarean section, especially the Random Forest model which performed well and promoted the application of artificial intelligence computer learning methods in the field of medical analysis.

Risk Factors of Intraoperative Pressure Injury in Adult Patients Undergoing Neurologic Surgery.

GENERAL PURPOSE: To present research investigating the incidence of and risk factors associated with intraoperative pressure injury in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Identify the incidence of intraoperative pressure injuries (PIs) in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China.2. Describe risk factors for intraoperative PI.3. Outline strategies to help mitigate intraoperative PI risk.

Intraoperative pressure injury (PI) development is an adverse event that impacts thousands of patients globally and is associated with extended hospital stays and increased risk of mortality. To investigate the incidence of intraoperative PI in patients undergoing neurologic surgery and identify associated risk factors. A total of 1,728 patients who underwent neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between January 2021 and December 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The authors collected patients' demographic data and clinical characteristics and used univariate and multivariate regression to evaluate significant PI risk factors. Intraoperative PI was observed in 1.8% of all surgical cases (n = 31). Having a body mass index greater than 24 kg/m2 (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.62­9.23; P = .002), being in a lateral position (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.04­6.17; P = .042) or a prone position (odds ratio, 10.43; 95% CI, 3.37­32.23; P < .001), and having a longer operation time (cutoff point at 7.92 hours for increased risk of PI; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.21­1.53; P < .001) were significant risk factors for intraoperative PI. This study identified three independent risk factors for intraoperative PI development: body position, surgery duration, and high body mass index. These findings can help OR nurses identify patients who are vulnerable to intraoperative PI and provide appropriate preventive measures. For these patients, perioperative protection and frequent microrepositioning during surgery would be indispensable.

Prevention of esophageal lesions during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using esophageal temperature monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The use of esophageal temperature monitoring (ETM) for the prevention of esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often advocated. However, evidence supporting its use is scarce and controversial. We therefore aimed to review the evidence assessing the efficacy of ETM for the prevention of esophageal injury. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature from inception to December 31, 2022. All studies comparing the use of ETM, versus no ETM, during radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation and which reported the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDELs) were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 1112 patients undergoing RF AF ablation were identified. Of those patients, 627 were assigned to ETM (56%). The overall incidence of EDELs was 9.8%. The use of ETM during AF ablation was associated with a non significant increase in the incidence of EDELs (12.3% with ETM, vs. 6.6 % without ETM, odds ratio, 1.44, 95%CI, 0.49, 4.22, p = .51, I2 = 72%). The use of ETM was associated with a significant increase in the energy delivered specifically on the posterior wall compared to patients without ETM (mean power difference: 5.13 Watts, 95% CI, 1.52, 8.74, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ETM does not reduce the incidence of EDELs during RF AF ablation. The higher energy delivered on the posterior wall is likely attributable to a false sense of safety that may explain the lack of benefit of ETM. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive results.

Perioperative anaphylaxis and the principle of primum non nocere.

Perioperative anaphylaxis is a rare and unpredictable event that continues to cause patient harm. More work is needed to decrease the risk to patients through measures to limit sensitisation, optimise management and investigation, and ensure that patients are not inadvertently re-exposed to allergens. Robust epidemiological data such as that provided by the consecutive GERAP surveys over the past 30 yr have been invaluable in defining the problem, identifying emerging allergens, acting as a catalyst for change, and stimulating research.

Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding safe intraoperative blood pressure thresholds that protect against postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). This review aims to examine the existing literature to delineate safe intraoperative hypotension (IOH) parameters to prevent postoperative AKI. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published between 2015 and 2022 relating the effects of IOH on postoperative AKI. RESULTS: Our search yielded 19 articles. IOH risk thresholds ranged from <50 to <75 â€‹mmHg for mean arterial pressure (MAP) and from <70 to <100 â€‹mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP). MAP below 65 â€‹mmHg for over 5 â€‹min was the most cited threshold (N â€‹= â€‹13) consistently associated with increased postoperative AKI. Greater magnitude and duration of MAP and SBP below the thresholds were generally associated with a dose-dependent increase in postoperative AKI incidence. CONCLUSIONS: While a consistent definition for IOH remains elusive, the evidence suggests that MAP below 65 â€‹mmHg for over 5 â€‹min is strongly associated with postoperative AKI, with the risk increasing with the magnitude and duration of IOH.

[Intraoperative Complications in Cataract Surgery]. / Intraoperative Komplikationen der Kataraktchirurgie.

Cataract surgery is frequently and successfully performed in the developed world. The indications for the operation have shifted on one hand towards healthier patients seeking freedom from glasses and on the other hand towards more complex cases. How should the patient be informed? What complications can occur intraoperatively, and what treatment options are available for these complications?This article offers a focus on conditions such as zonulopathy and pseudoexfoliation that can pose challenges to cataract surgery. It discusses the use of specialized tools such as capsular tension rings and capsular hooks and precise maneuvers to minimize stress on weakened zonules in order to ensure in-the-bag fixation of the IOL.Furthermore, the article addresses appropriate actions towards intraoperative complications such as anterior or posterior capsule ruptures and loss of nuclear fragments into the vitreous cavity.Exploring innovative advancements, this article presents the latest alternatives for intracapsular lens fixation, such as sutureless scleral fixation and emerging lens designs in cases where there is insufficient capsular support.Ultimately, the primary objective remains delivering optimal outcomes even for complex cases, and minimizing post-surgical issues. Numerous tools and techniques are available.

A Narrative Review on Intraoperative Adverse Events: Risks, Prevention, and Mitigation.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse events from surgical interventions are common. They can occur at various stages of surgical care, and they carry a heavy burden on the different parties involved. While extensive research and efforts have been made to better understand the etiologies of postoperative complications, more research on intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) remains to be done. METHODS: In this article, we reviewed the literature looking at iAEs to discuss their risk factors, their implications on surgical care, and the current efforts to mitigate and manage them. RESULTS: Risk factors for iAEs are diverse and are dictated by patient-related risk factors, the nature and complexity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, and the work environment of the operating room. The implications of iAEs vary according to their severity and include increased rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, increased length of hospital stay and readmission, increased care cost, and a second victim emotional toll on the operating surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: While transparent reporting of iAEs remains a challenge, many efforts are using new measures not only to report iAEs but also to provide better surveillance, prevention, and mitigation strategies to reduce their overall adverse impact.

How to Recognize, Correct, and Avoid Intraoperative Complications During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.

Technical complications are a leading cause of graft failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Complications can occur during any phase of the procedure, from graft harvesting to tunnel preparation to graft fixation. Predicting potential causes of technical difficulty and developing strategies to avoid potential pitfalls can limit the number of intraoperative complications. If adverse events do occur intraoperatively, prompt recognition and treatment can lead to favorable outcomes. It is important to discuss strategies to understand potential complications and develop tactics to avoid and correct adverse events that can occur during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Maximizing surgical safety: Approaches to prevent intraoperative complications in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS).

BACKGROUND: In manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS), the occurrence of intraoperative complications is a recognized concern that can impact both surgical outcomes and patient safety. MSICS is widely practiced as a cost-effective alternative for cataract extraction, especially in resource-limited settings where access to phacoemulsification may be limited. However, it is important to acknowledge that MSICS is not entirely risk-free. Complications during the surgery can arise due to factors such as surgeon experience, surgical technique, instrument handling, and patient-specific anatomical variations. Common complications encountered in MSICS include posterior capsule rupture, corneal burns, iris trauma, wound-related issues, vitreous loss, and anterior chamber hemorrhage. It is crucial for surgeons to have a comprehensive understanding of the background and potential risks associated with these complications. This knowledge allows them to proactively implement preventive strategies, optimize surgical outcomes, and prioritize patient safety during MSICS procedures. Ongoing efforts in the field of cataract surgery aim to improve outcomes by advancing surgical techniques, refining equipment, and enhancing postoperative care. Through research and innovation, the goal is to minimize complications and achieve optimal visual outcomes for individuals undergoing cataract surgery. PURPOSE: This video discusses the possible complications and provides practical strategies to minimize the same at each step of the MSICS procedure. SYNOPSIS: The video demonstrates the potential complications that can occur intraoperatively during MSICS and highlights the significance of careful technique and practical strategies for prevention. HIGHLIGHTS: In resource-poor settings, MSICS is widely used as the predominant technique for cataract surgeries. Despite being a cost-effective alternative, MSICS offers comparable visual outcomes to phacoemulsification with low complication rates. This video emphasizes the importance of proactive measures and careful technique in preventing complications, thereby improving patient safety and outcomes in MSICS. VIDEO LINK: https://youtu.be/hOAMJpC67C0.

How to Prevent and Manage Postoperative Complications in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using the Lateral Approach: A Review.

Maxillary sinus augmentation with a lateral approach is known to present more postoperative complications than other atrophic posterior maxilla treatment modalities because it is more invasive. These complications include infections that occur in the form of chronic or acute sinusitis. According to the literature, the frequency of these complications ranges from 3% to 5%. They can result from an inadequate management of intraoperative complications or from a poor evaluation of maxillary sinus particularities and pathology before the surgery. Therefore, the prevention of postoperative complications lies in the selection of cases that will allow for the identification and evaluation of infectious risk. Only a multidisciplinary approach that includes an implantologist, a rhinologist, and the treating physician will allow this. On the other hand, in infectious complication cases, the intervention of the otorhinolaryngologist (ENT) specialist is necessary. Based on the available literature and the author's experience, the methodology described in this article will allow for the prevention and management of postoperative complications related to this surgical technique.

Intraoperative blood pressure: could less be more?

Retrospective observational studies have reported a significant association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative morbidity. However, association does not imply causation, and whether preventing intraoperative hypotension can improve patient outcome remains to be demonstrated. In this issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia, D'Amico and colleagues meta-analysed 10 prospective randomised trials comparing low (≤60 mm Hg) and higher mean arterial pressure targets during anaesthesia and surgery. They did not observe an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality in the low target group. In contrast, they reported a statistically significant (but not clinically relevant) reduction in postoperative cardiac arrhythmia and hospital length of stay when targeting mean arterial pressure ≤60 mm Hg. These findings suggest that during most surgical cases, intraoperative hypotension is a marker of the severity, frailty, or both rather than a mediator of postoperative complications.

Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia.

Temperature regulation during the perioperative period plays an essential role in keeping patients safe while optimizing their recovery. The World Health Organization recommends preserving normothermia, identified as a core body temperature greater than 36°C, to minimize morbidity and mortality. The etiology of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH) varies in origin. Preoperative exposure, decreased ambient operating room (OR) temperature, skin exposure during preparation, unwarmed skin preparation and washout solutions, and lack of warming devices all contribute to IPH. Moreover, general and regional anesthesia blunt the physiologic response to hypothermia which originates in the hypothalamus. Postoperatively, patients with temperatures < 36°C are at greater risk for surgical site infection, increased mortality, longer length of hospital stay, higher 30-day readmission rates, among other complications. Identifying preoperative risk factors and OR practices that contribute to IPH, monitoring temperatures, and use of warming devices during the perioperative period can help to prevent IPH.

Enhance Safety in Aneurysm Surgery: Strategies for Prevention of Intraoperative Vascular Complications.

Complications during surgery for intracranial aneurysms can be devastating. Notorious pitfalls include premature rupture, parent vessel occlusion, local cerebral injury and brain contusion, and incomplete neck obliteration. These unfavorable intraoperative events can result in major neurological deficits with permanent morbidity and even mortality. Herein, the author highlights the relevant surgical strategies used in his daily practice of aneurysm surgery (e.g., aneurysm clipping with adenosine-induced temporary cardiac arrest), application of which may help prevent vascular complications and enhance surgical safety through reduction of the associated risks, thus allowing improvement of postoperative outcomes. Overall, all described methods and techniques should be considered as small pieces in the complex puzzle of prevention of vascular complications during aneurysm surgery.

Incidence of Unintentional Intraoperative Hypothermia and Its Risk Factors in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: Unintentional intraoperative hypothermia is a common complication in patients who undergo open surgery, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. However, few studies have focused on intraoperative hypothermia during oral and maxillofacial surgery. Our study aimed to analyze the prevalence and risk factors of hypothermia in patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 128 patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at West China Hospital of Stomatology between December 2020 and May 2021, and each patient was followed for at least 1-month postoperatively. Patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia, with at least 1-month follow-up were analyzed. The primary variable was intraoperative hypothermia, defined as core body temperature less than 36°C, measured using a tympanic thermometer during the surgery. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors of unintentional intraoperative hypothermia. FINDINGS: The mean age of the 128 patients was 31.0 ± 20.9 years, and there was a male predominance (53.1%), with male to female ratio of 1.13:1. Thirty-one patients (24.2%) developed hypothermia intraoperatively. Older age (OR = 1.068, 95% CI: 1.028-1.110, P = .001), lower weight (OR = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.807-0.955, P = .002), greater blood loss (OR = 1.003, 95% CI: 1.000-1.006, P = .034), and undergoing cancer surgery (OR = 0.210, 95% CI: 0.067-0.656, P = .007) were associated with intraoperative hypothermia. CONCLUSIONS: Unintentional intraoperative hypothermia is common in patients who undergo surgery for oral cancer. Warming interventions to prevent intraoperative hypothermia for high-risk patients (older, lower weight, or more intraoperative bleeding) should be considered. Meanwhile, with careful nursing and rehabilitation instructions, intraoperative hypothermia does not lead to serious perioperative complications.